A forerunner of this article ran eight years ago. I doubt the facts would have changed if the data were current. Individual investors tend to have an enemy. In his comic strip Pogo, Walt Kelly pointed out, “We have seen the enemy, and he is us.” That’s the point
Blackrock claims that over the 20 years ended December 2013, the typical individual investor has done “shockingly” badly.
According to them, of 44 asset classes considered, the typical investor beat inflation and two other categories.
Buy and hold any of 40 or so classes was superior, in most cases very superior.
If you create a histogram of index returns over long periods, you will find that the outcome is not quite a normal distribution. (Bell Curve) You’ll find a higher than expected probability on both ends. The bump on the downside is fear. People do not deal well with fear. They tend to sell and go away. Prices fall more and collect up more of the emotional beings in the morass.
The bump on the plus side is greed. Time to get in. Easy money. This bump leads to buying at the highs. Not such a good tactic.
People make poor choices when their decisions are emotionally driven, and it shows up in the market graphs.
Even good years have periods of decline.
If you read a little further into the article, you will see that the range of returns within a year is wide. The average decline in the 40 years studied was 14%. That’s enough to scare many people.
When people lose track of the purpose or the reality of the market, they do poorly. Some things are not that hard. Shockingly badly is not a hard target to beat. Pete Rose commentated about a player batting less than .200, “C’mon Ray Charles could bat .200” Narrow your track is usually enough to get average results.
An experienced advisor can provide helpful service in areas 5, 6, and 7 above.
I vaguely recall a Harvard study from the ’60s or ’70s that found that of individual traders over time, 1% made money, 2% broke even, and the other 97% lost money. Often all of it. Emotion has more to do with those losses than does inadequate skill.
Despite the critics who believe investment management fees are not worth their price, you might find that paying a fee could be a good investment. I doubt it would be a “shockingly bad” decision.
You would think a juvenile monkey with a handful of darts could beat more than two asset classes.
If someone has updated information like the Blackrock example, I’d like to see it.
Help me, please. Please subscribe. If you have found this article helpful, forward it to others.
I build strategic, fact-based estate and income plans. The plans identify alternate ways to achieve spending and estate distribution goals. In the past, I have been a planner with a large insurance, employee benefits, and investment agency, a partner in a large international public accounting firm, CEO of a software start-up, a partner in an energy management system importer, and briefly in the restaurant business. I have appeared on more than 100 television shows on financial planning have presented to organizations as varied as the Canadian Bar Association, The Ontario Institute of Chartered Accountants, The Ontario Ministry of Agriculture and Food, and Banks – from CIBC to the Business Development Bank.
Be in touch at 705-927-4770 or by email at email@example.com.
Pingback: D-I-Y Investing Is Not For Everyone – moneyFYI